Select Page

DNA: coming on strong

Not an outlier any more In case you’ve been living on the dark side of the moon in recent years, DNA isn’t the new kid on the block any more. It’s not an outlier in the genealogical community. It’s part and parcel of what every genealogist...

The hack

Protecting yourself from it It’s a sad day when even genealogists are affected by hackers. The Legal Genealogist opened her email accounts this morning and there at the top of the inbox was an email from a genealogist friend. “Incoming Google drive document...

Credit and copyright

Following up Yesterday, The Legal Genealogist took on the topic of the copyright that genealogical speakers have in their lectures, slides and handouts. The impetus was last week’s combined Federation of Genealogical Societies and RootsTech conference, and the...

A matter of consent

Ask first So last week the question posed to The Legal Genealogist was whether the cousin who had paid for a DNA test should share the results with the cousin who took the DNA test. The no-brainer answer is yes.1 Just because you paid for a test doesn’t mean you...

Whose DNA it is anyway?

Access to results A question arrived by email a couple of days ago that left The Legal Genealogist simply shaking her head. “My cousin bought two DNA test kits and asked if I would like to use one,” the reader wrote. “I did so. However, when the tests came back, she...

DNA: good news, bad news

Yes and no DNA is so often a matter of bad news mixed in with the good, isn’t it? And this past week’s news out of Salt Lake City has been no exception. The bad news Let’s get the bad news out of the way first: There isn’t going to be a...

It bears repeating: just say no

Say, would you mind…? (Note: This issue came up again in the discussions after yesterday’s blog post on taking the work of others without crediting them. It’s another side to the ethical issues we deal with, and this post from last year is repeated...

It’s not sharing

It’s theft Yet another case of genealogical theft is being reported in our community. This time, it’s the website GenealogyInTime Magazine reporting that some of its authored, copyrighted content is being reproduced, almost word for word, in the newsletter...