Territorial voting rights
Nebraska was a territory at the time; it didn’t achieve statehood until 1867.1 So would a territorial resident have been able to vote in the federal elections of 1864?
There weren’t any federal elected officials a territorial citizen then could vote for.
Think about it.
In 1864, only three types of federal officials would have been elected by any individual voter out there anywhere in the United States.
First, all of the members of the House of Representatives would have been up for election. But no territory had a representative in the House. That’s because the United States Constitution provided then and provides now that:
The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.
No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.2
No State, no Congressman.
Second, one-third of the members of the United States Senate would have been up for election. But, like the situation with the House, no territory could elect a Senator because of constitutional limits. The 1787 Constitution provided that:
The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each state, chosen by the legislature thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. …
No person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the age of thirty years, and been nine years a citizen of the United States and who shall not, when elected, be an inhabitant of that state for which he shall be chosen.3
That section has since been amended to provide that “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each state, elected by the people thereof…”4 Still, then as now, no State, no Senator.
And the third type of federal official elected in 1864 was not, as some might think, the President and Vice President of the United States. Because then, as now, the Constitution didn’t provide for direct popular election of those officials. Instead, it provided and provides for election by electors, members of the Electoral College:
The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his office during the term of four years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same term, be elected, as follows:
Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors, equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or person holding an office of trust or profit under the United States, shall be appointed an elector.
The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Persons, of whom one at least shall not be an Inhabitant of the same State with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President …5
There again… no State, no electors.
So the answer is simply no. A resident of a territory couldn’t vote in federal elections.6
- “An Act for the Admission of the State of Nebraska into the Union,” 14 Stat. 391 (9 Feb 1867); digital images, “A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation: U.S. Congressional Documents and Debates, 1774-1875,” Library of Congress, American Memory (http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/index.html : accessed 8 Feb 2013). ↩
- United States Constitution, Article I, § 2. ↩
- Ibid., Article I, § 3. ↩
- Ibid., Amendment XVII (emphasis added. ↩
- Ibid., Article III, § 1. See also Amendment XII. ↩
- And, by the way, they still can’t. As recently as 2005, the courts have repeatedly held that the Constitution limits the vote to citizens who live in the states, not in territories. See Igartua-de la Rosa v. United States, 417 F.3d 145 (1st Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 547 U.S. 1035 (2006) (challenge by citizen and resident of Puerto Rico). ↩